Re: [PATCH 3/3] qemu: introduce vram64 attribute for QXL video device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:26:42PM +0100, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 04:16:49PM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 02:34:14PM +0100, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
>This attribute is used to extend secondary PCI bar and expose it to the
>guest as 64bit memory.  It works like this: attribute vram is there to
>set size of secondary PCI bar and guest sees it as 32bit memory,
>attribute vram64 can extend this secondary PCI bar.  If both attributes
>are used, guest sees two memory bars, both address the same memory, with
>the difference that the 32bit bar can address only the first part of the
>whole memory.
>
>Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260749
>
>Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@xxxxxxxxxx>
>---
> docs/formatdomain.html.in                          |  2 ++
> docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng                      |  5 ++++
> src/conf/domain_conf.c                             | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----
> src/conf/domain_conf.h                             |  1 +
> src/qemu/qemu_command.c                            | 13 +++++++++
> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c                       |  8 +++++
> .../qemuxml2argv-video-qxl-device-vram64.args      | 25 ++++++++++++++++
> .../qemuxml2argv-video-qxl-device-vram64.xml       | 29 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../qemuxml2argv-video-qxl-sec-device-vram64.args  | 27 +++++++++++++++++
> .../qemuxml2argv-video-qxl-sec-device-vram64.xml   | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 10 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/qemuxml2argv-video-qxl-device-vram64.args
> create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/qemuxml2argv-video-qxl-device-vram64.xml
> create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/qemuxml2argv-video-qxl-sec-device-vram64.args
> create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/qemuxml2argv-video-qxl-sec-device-vram64.xml
>
>diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>index 3fcd728..318ffd9 100644
>--- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>+++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>@@ -5191,6 +5191,8 @@ qemu-kvm -net nic,model=? /dev/null
>           two as <code>vram</code>. There is also optional attribute
>           <code>vgamem</code> (<span class="since">since 1.2.11</span>) to set
>           the size of VGA framebuffer for fallback mode of QXL device.
>+          Attribute <code>vram64</code> (<span class="since">since 1.3.2</span>)
>+          extends secondary bar and makes it addressable as 64bit memory.
>         </p>
>       </dd>
>
>diff --git a/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng b/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng
>index 67af93a..fe5eaf0 100644
>--- a/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng
>+++ b/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng
>@@ -2938,6 +2938,11 @@
>                   <ref name="unsignedInt"/>
>                 </attribute>
>               </optional>
>+              <optional>
>+                <attribute name="vram64">
>+                  <ref name="unsignedInt"/>
>+                </attribute>
>+              </optional>
>             </group>
>           </choice>
>           <optional>
>diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>index 56bd1aa..76fc52a 100644
>--- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>+++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>@@ -11898,6 +11898,7 @@ virDomainVideoDefParseXML(xmlNodePtr node,
>     char *type = NULL;
>     char *heads = NULL;
>     char *vram = NULL;
>+    char *vram64 = NULL;
>     char *ram = NULL;
>     char *vgamem = NULL;
>     char *primary = NULL;
>@@ -11913,6 +11914,7 @@ virDomainVideoDefParseXML(xmlNodePtr node,
>                 type = virXMLPropString(cur, "type");
>                 ram = virXMLPropString(cur, "ram");
>                 vram = virXMLPropString(cur, "vram");
>+                vram64 = virXMLPropString(cur, "vram64");
>                 vgamem = virXMLPropString(cur, "vgamem");
>                 heads = virXMLPropString(cur, "heads");
>
>@@ -11967,6 +11969,19 @@ virDomainVideoDefParseXML(xmlNodePtr node,
>         def->vram = virDomainVideoDefaultRAM(dom, def->type);
>     }
>
>+    if (vram64) {
>+        if (def->type != VIR_DOMAIN_VIDEO_TYPE_QXL) {
>+            virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR, "%s",
>+                           _("vram64 attribute only supported for type of qxl"));
>+            goto error;
>+        }
>+        if (virStrToLong_uip(vram64, NULL, 10, &def->vram64) < 0) {
>+            virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR,
>+                           _("cannot parse video vram64 '%s'"), vram64);
>+            goto error;
>+        }
>+    }
>+
>     if (vgamem) {
>         if (def->type != VIR_DOMAIN_VIDEO_TYPE_QXL) {
>             virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR, "%s",
>@@ -11993,9 +12008,11 @@ virDomainVideoDefParseXML(xmlNodePtr node,
>     if (virDomainDeviceInfoParseXML(node, NULL, &def->info, flags) < 0)
>         goto error;
>
>+ cleanup:
>     VIR_FREE(type);
>     VIR_FREE(ram);
>     VIR_FREE(vram);
>+    VIR_FREE(vram64);
>     VIR_FREE(vgamem);
>     VIR_FREE(heads);
>
>@@ -12003,12 +12020,8 @@ virDomainVideoDefParseXML(xmlNodePtr node,
>
>  error:
>     virDomainVideoDefFree(def);
>-    VIR_FREE(type);
>-    VIR_FREE(ram);
>-    VIR_FREE(vram);
>-    VIR_FREE(vgamem);
>-    VIR_FREE(heads);
>-    return NULL;
>+    def = NULL;
>+    goto cleanup;
> }
>
> static virDomainHostdevDefPtr
>@@ -17023,6 +17036,13 @@ virDomainVideoDefCheckABIStability(virDomainVideoDefPtr src,
>         return false;
>     }
>
>+    if (src->vram64 != dst->vram64) {
>+        virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED,
>+                       _("Target video card vram64 %u does not match source %u"),
>+                       dst->vram64, src->vram64);
>+        return false;
>+    }
>+

Does this check make sense if we're updating that value after QEMU
starts?

Yes, it makes sense, this will ensure, that user doesn't change this value via
qemu hook.


>     if (src->vgamem != dst->vgamem) {
>         virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED,
>                        _("Target video card vgamem %u does not match source %u"),
>@@ -20708,6 +20728,8 @@ virDomainVideoDefFormat(virBufferPtr buf,
>         virBufferAsprintf(buf, " ram='%u'", def->ram);
>     if (def->vram)
>         virBufferAsprintf(buf, " vram='%u'", def->vram);
>+    if (def->vram64)
>+        virBufferAsprintf(buf, " vram64='%u'", def->vram64);
>     if (def->vgamem)
>         virBufferAsprintf(buf, " vgamem='%u'", def->vgamem);
>     if (def->heads)
>diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.h b/src/conf/domain_conf.h
>index 1de3be3..c3a7386 100644
>--- a/src/conf/domain_conf.h
>+++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.h
>@@ -1399,6 +1399,7 @@ struct _virDomainVideoDef {
>     int type;
>     unsigned int ram;  /* kibibytes (multiples of 1024) */
>     unsigned int vram; /* kibibytes (multiples of 1024) */
>+    unsigned int vram64; /* kibibytes (multiples of 1024) */
>     unsigned int vgamem; /* kibibytes (multiples of 1024) */
>     unsigned int heads;
>     bool primary;
>diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
>index 78423e7..24ddd8a 100644
>--- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
>+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
>@@ -3347,6 +3347,12 @@ qemuBuildDeviceVideoStr(virDomainDefPtr def,
>             virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",vram_size=%u", video->vram * 1024);
>         }
>
>+        if ((primary && virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_QXL_VGA_VRAM64)) ||
>+            (!primary && virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_QXL_VRAM64))) {
>+            /* QEMU accepts mebibytes for vram64_size_mb. */
>+            virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",vram64_size_mb=%u", video->vram64 / 1024);
>+        }
>+

Why do we both set the size here (for both primary and secondary card), ...

This code is a part of for cycle for all video devices.  This means, if current
video device is primary, we need to check different flag than for secondary
video device.

Note: Both secondary and primary qxl video device are internally represented by
the same device model in qemu, so both of them will ether have this feature or
not.


Yes, I know that, it was just an introduction to ...


>         if ((primary && virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_QXL_VGA_VGAMEM)) ||
>             (!primary && virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_QXL_VGAMEM))) {
>             /* QEMU accepts mebibytes for vgamem_mb. */
>@@ -8254,6 +8260,7 @@ qemuBuildCommandLine(virConnectPtr conn,
>                     virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE)) {
>                     unsigned int ram = def->videos[0]->ram;
>                     unsigned int vram = def->videos[0]->vram;
>+                    unsigned int vram64 = def->videos[0]->vram64;
>                     unsigned int vgamem = def->videos[0]->vgamem;
>
>                     if (vram > (UINT_MAX / 1024)) {
>@@ -8279,6 +8286,12 @@ qemuBuildCommandLine(virConnectPtr conn,
>                         virCommandAddArgFormat(cmd, "%s.vram_size=%u",
>                                                dev, vram * 1024);
>                     }
>+                    if (vram64 &&
>+                        virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_QXL_VGA_VRAM64)) {
>+                        virCommandAddArg(cmd, "-global");
>+                        virCommandAddArgFormat(cmd, "%s.vram64_size_mb=%u",
>+                                               dev, vram64 / 1024);
>+                    }

... and also set it here?  And mostly why do we check only for primary
card capability here?  I remember that this was needed for some
parameters when QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE was a variable (before we switched to
supporting only QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE-enabled versions).  Although the code
does the opposite thing (uses '-global' only for qemu with '-device'
supported).  I must be clearly on a bad track here.

This is probably a dead code since we've removed support for qemu that doesn't
have -device.  Without -device it was possible only have one video device.

This should be removed, but not as part of this series.


... this question.  Good that we're on the same page, I just wanted to
make sure I understand it the same way you do.


>                     if (vgamem &&
>                         virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_QXL_VGA_VGAMEM)) {
>                         virCommandAddArg(cmd, "-global");
>diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c
>index d2b641f..34efd4f 100644
>--- a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c
>+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c
>@@ -1436,6 +1436,14 @@ qemuMonitorJSONUpdateVideoMemorySize(qemuMonitorPtr mon,
>             return -1;
>         }
>         video->vram = prop.val.ul / 1024;
>+        if (qemuMonitorJSONGetObjectProperty(mon, path,
>+                                             "vram64_size_mb", &prop) < 0) {
>+            virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
>+                           _("QOM Object '%s' has no property 'vram64_size_mb'"),
>+                           path);
>+            return -1;
>+        }
>+        video->vram64 = prop.val.ul / 1024;

And a last question: why don't we just skip the vram64_size_mb if it's
not available and move on to the next one?  What if it's a bit older
QEMU?

I'm not sure about this, but if a device supports some attribute, it should be
also present in QOM Object.  If this happens, something is really wrong :)


Yes, but we are not checking that it supports that attribute anywhere.
Or are you saying that whenever QEMU supports qxl, it has this property?

Pavel


For all the questions a short explanation might be enough as all the
other properties are coded following the same fashion.  That doesn't
make them correct, though, so the explanation is still needed.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]