On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 17:19:19 -0500, John Ferlan wrote: > On 12/23/2015 09:25 AM, Dmitry Andreev wrote: > > Reverting to snapshot may change domain configuration but > > there will be no events about that. I'm afraid there will be more places like this ... > > > > Lack of the event become a problem for virt-manager > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081148 > > > > This patch-set introduces new event and emits it in > > qemuDomainRevertToSnapshot. [...] > > > > > > This seems to be a reasonable approach; however, since Peter understands > the snapshot code better than I do, I expect he will want to chime in > (I've CC'd him). I don't currently see a problem with emiting the event. We indeed replace the complete definition with something else so a 'DEFINED' event is probably appropriate. Peter
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list