On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 12:07:43PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > Dear list, > > I've noticed a failed build on CentOS-6 after some commits. Problem was > that old gcc is not wise enough and produces a false positive. I've > proposed a patch for that [1] but honestly, neither am I - like Peter - > very fond of this approach. We should not try to fix a good code because > of some spurious warnings. Moreover if they happen on a system that is > considered stable and thus nobody should run recent libvirt on it. > > In RHEL-6/CentOS-6 there's libvirt-0.10.2 which is 3.5 years old now. > > I'm starting this thread so that the decision and discussion is clear > and not buried under discussion to the patch. > > If we happen to stop caring we probably should stop our CentOS-6 build > in jenkins too [2]. IMHO it is well premature to stop caring about RHEL-6. We only just dropped support for RHEL-5, but RHEL-6 is very much still a widely used platform and will continue to be so for a good while yet. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list