Re: [PATCH 6/8] perf: reenable perf events when libvirtd restart

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berrange@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 11:21 PM
> To: Ren, Qiaowei
> Cc: libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx; Jiri Denemark
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] perf: reenable perf events when libvirtd restart
> 
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 08:34:36PM +0800, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
> > When libvirtd daemon restart, this patch will reenable those perf
> > events previously enabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c index
> > 7d95364..09607ca 100644
> > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> > @@ -164,6 +164,9 @@ static int qemuDomainGetMaxVcpus(virDomainPtr
> > dom);  static int qemuDomainManagedSaveLoad(virDomainObjPtr vm,
> >                                       void *opaque);
> >
> > +static int qemuDomainPerfRestart(virDomainObjPtr vm,
> > +                                 void *data);
> > +
> >  static int qemuOpenFile(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
> >                          virDomainObjPtr vm,
> >                          const char *path, int oflags, @@ -939,6
> > +942,10 @@ qemuStateInitialize(bool privileged,
> >                              qemuDomainManagedSaveLoad,
> >                              qemu_driver);
> >
> > +    virDomainObjListForEach(qemu_driver->domains,
> > +                            qemuDomainPerfRestart,
> > +                            NULL);
> > +
> >      qemuProcessReconnectAll(conn, qemu_driver);
> >
> >      qemu_driver->workerPool = virThreadPoolNew(0, 1, 0,
> > qemuProcessEventHandler, qemu_driver); @@ -3460,6 +3467,35 @@
> qemuDomainManagedSaveLoad(virDomainObjPtr vm,
> >      return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int
> > +qemuDomainPerfRestart(virDomainObjPtr vm,
> > +                      void *data ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) {
> > +    size_t i;
> > +    virDomainDefPtr def = vm->def;
> > +    qemuDomainObjPrivatePtr priv = vm->privateData;
> > +
> > +    virPerfFree(priv->perf);
> > +
> > +    priv->perf = virPerfNew();
> > +    if (!priv->perf)
> > +        return -1;
> > +
> > +    for (i = 0; i < VIR_PERF_EVENT_LAST; i++) {
> > +        if (def->perf->events[i] &&
> > +            def->perf->events[i] == VIR_TRISTATE_BOOL_YES) {
> > +            if (virPerfEventEnable(priv->perf, i, vm->pid))
> > +                goto cleanup;
> > +        }
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    return 0;
> > +
> > + cleanup:
> > +    virPerfFree(priv->perf);
> > +    return -1;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> Oh, I suggested we add this in qemuProcessReconnect in a previous patch
> 

Yes. I will do this in  qemuProcessReconnect and qemuProcessAttach according to the comments in patch 4/8, but because this patch have to depend on the new XML element (patch 5/8), and so I have to put these code into the patch and could not merge it into the patch 4/8. ^-^

Thanks,
Qiaowei

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]