On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:20:50AM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote: > From: Cristian Klein <cristiklein@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Klein <cristiklein@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Notes: > The migration capability is called x-postcopy-ram in QEMU, which > means it's still considered experimental. The main reason for it > is to make sure the feature is complete from libvirt's point of > view. The "x-" prefix will be removed once we have a working > implementation. So if we decide this patchset is OK, will QEMU remove the 'x-' prefix from their code for 2.6 ? It would be desirable not to merge code in libvirt that uses the 'x-' prefix at all. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list