Re: [PATCH] Unify int types handling in protocol files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



  Martin Kletzander wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:49:52AM +0300, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> >From: Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <jasper@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >Some of the protocol files already include handing of the missing int
> >types such as xdr_uint64_t, some don't. To fix it everywhere, move out
> >of the appropriate defines to internal.h and include it whenever needed.
> >
> 
> Almost what I meant.  I don't think XDR-related definitions should be in
> internal.h, it would then be defined everywhere.  Also, protocols don't
> need anything from internal.h, so it doesn't make much sense to me.  I
> would put it in a separate file.

Well, as some of the protocol files were including internal.h, I hoped I
would use it and also cheat a little so I didn't have to come up with a
name for the new file. :-)

If that's not a proper one, I'll create a separate file for that.

Thanks,

Roman Bogorodskiy

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]