Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 06:41:21AM +0300, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > > Make bhyveload respect boot order as specified by os.boot section of the > > domain XML or by "boot order" for specific devices. As bhyve does not > > support a real boot order specification right now, it's just about > > choosing a single device to boot from. > > So if bhyve only lets you specify a single device to boot from, > then we should report an error to the user if they provide more > than one <boot> element in the XML. The reason that I did it this way was because my original intention was to make it work with virt-manager smoother. However, I think you're right, it's better to error on configuration we cannot properly support instead of letting users have false expectation. It will make creation of new VM via virt-manager fail with the default configuration, but it's not critical because user still have to modify some hardware settings anyway to make it work with bhyve (i.e.: drop vnc and pty console). Thanks for the review, I'll upload v2 shortly. Roman Bogorodskiy -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list