On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 21:13:56 +0100, Piotr Rybicki wrote: > W dniu 2015-11-19 o 17:31, Michal Privoznik pisze: ... > > > > ==2650== 7,692,288 bytes in 2 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1,444 of 1,452 > > ==2650== at 0x4C2BFC8: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > > ==2650== by 0x1061335C: __gf_default_calloc (mem-pool.h:75) > > ==2650== by 0x106137D2: __gf_calloc (mem-pool.c:104) > > ==2650== by 0x1061419D: mem_pool_new_fn (mem-pool.c:316) > > ==2650== by 0xFD69DDA: glusterfs_ctx_defaults_init (glfs.c:110) > > ==2650== by 0xFD6AC31: glfs_new@@GFAPI_3.4.0 (glfs.c:558) > > ==2650== by 0xF90321E: virStorageFileBackendGlusterInit (storage_backend_gluster.c:611) > > ==2650== by 0xF8F43AF: virStorageFileInitAs (storage_driver.c:2736) > > ==2650== by 0x115AE41A: qemuDomainStorageFileInit (qemu_domain.c:2929) > > ==2650== by 0x1163DE5A: qemuDomainSnapshotCreateSingleDiskActive (qemu_driver.c:14201) > > ==2650== by 0x1163E604: qemuDomainSnapshotCreateDiskActive (qemu_driver.c:14371) > > ==2650== by 0x1163ED27: qemuDomainSnapshotCreateActiveExternal (qemu_driver.c:14559) > > ==2650== > > ==2650== 7,692,288 bytes in 2 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1,445 of 1,452 > > ==2650== at 0x4C2BFC8: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > > ==2650== by 0x1061335C: __gf_default_calloc (mem-pool.h:75) > > ==2650== by 0x106137D2: __gf_calloc (mem-pool.c:104) > > ==2650== by 0x1061419D: mem_pool_new_fn (mem-pool.c:316) > > ==2650== by 0xFD69DDA: glusterfs_ctx_defaults_init (glfs.c:110) > > ==2650== by 0xFD6AC31: glfs_new@@GFAPI_3.4.0 (glfs.c:558) > > ==2650== by 0xF90321E: virStorageFileBackendGlusterInit (storage_backend_gluster.c:611) > > ==2650== by 0xF8F43AF: virStorageFileInitAs (storage_driver.c:2736) > > ==2650== by 0xF8F4B0A: virStorageFileGetMetadataRecurse (storage_driver.c:2996) > > ==2650== by 0xF8F4F66: virStorageFileGetMetadata (storage_driver.c:3119) > > ==2650== by 0x115AE629: qemuDomainDetermineDiskChain (qemu_domain.c:2980) > > ==2650== by 0x1163E843: qemuDomainSnapshotCreateDiskActive (qemu_driver.c:14421) > > ==2650== > > ==2650== 7,692,288 bytes in 2 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1,446 of 1,452 > > ==2650== at 0x4C2BFC8: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > > ==2650== by 0x1061335C: __gf_default_calloc (mem-pool.h:75) > > ==2650== by 0x106137D2: __gf_calloc (mem-pool.c:104) > > ==2650== by 0x1061419D: mem_pool_new_fn (mem-pool.c:316) > > ==2650== by 0xFD69DDA: glusterfs_ctx_defaults_init (glfs.c:110) > > ==2650== by 0xFD6AC31: glfs_new@@GFAPI_3.4.0 (glfs.c:558) > > ==2650== by 0xF90321E: virStorageFileBackendGlusterInit (storage_backend_gluster.c:611) > > ==2650== by 0xF8F43AF: virStorageFileInitAs (storage_driver.c:2736) > > ==2650== by 0xF8F4B0A: virStorageFileGetMetadataRecurse (storage_driver.c:2996) > > ==2650== by 0xF8F4DC5: virStorageFileGetMetadataRecurse (storage_driver.c:3054) > > ==2650== by 0xF8F4F66: virStorageFileGetMetadata (storage_driver.c:3119) > > ==2650== by 0x115AE629: qemuDomainDetermineDiskChain (qemu_domain.c:2980) I've seen some of theese already. The bug is actually not in libvirt but in gluster's libgfapi library, so any change in libvirt won't help. This was tracked in gluster as: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093594 I suggest you update the gluster library to resolve this issue. Peter
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list