Re: [PATCH] tests: redo test argv file line wrapping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:00:04PM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 01:30:35PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >Back in
> >
> > commit bd6c46fa0cfe275c24debc1152cfc5206c04b59b
> > Author: Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@xxxxxx>
> > Date:   Mon Jan 31 06:42:57 2011 -0500
> >
> >   tests: handle backspace-newline pairs in test input files
> >
> >all the test argv files were line wrapped so that the args
> >were less than 80 characters.
> >
> >The way the line wrapping was done turns out to be quite
> >undesirable, because it often leaves multiple parameters
> >on the same line. If we later need to add or remove
> >individual parameters, then it leaves us having to redo
> >line wrapping.
> >
> >This commit changes the line wrapping so that every
> >single "-param value" is one its own new line. If the
> >"value" is still too long, then we break on ',' or ':'
> >or ' ' as needed.
> >
> 
> What if we fix the syntax-check instead and allow longer than 80
> character lines in case they have no space in it, or exactly one space
> (to allow --parameter option,option,option,...)?  That would make even
> corner cases easier to review, e.g. when you remove or add a parameter
> into the long list of parameters.

The alternative that I'm actually thinking is that we make
syntax-check skip line length on all these .args files.

Instead re-run the 'test-wrap-argv.pl' script during
syntax-check, and validate that no changeas are made.

This will guarantee that all our .args files are always
using our ideal formatting / line wrapping rules.

Then I could remove these two special cases and just let
us have "-arg value" lines exceed 80 characters when
they need to

> >'make check' and 'make syntax-check' of course still pass after
> >applying the big change.
> >
> >diff --git a/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl b/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl
> >new file mode 100644
> >index 0000000..e8c782b
> >--- /dev/null
> >+++ b/tests/test-wrap-argv.pl
> >@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
> >+#!/usr/bin/perl
> >+
> >+
> >+
> >+foreach my $file (@ARGV) {
> >+    &rewrap($file);
> >+}
> >+
> >+sub rewrap {
> >+    my $file = shift;
> >+
> >+    # Read the original file
> >+    open FILE, "<", $file or die "cannot read $file: $!";
> >+    my @lines;
> >+    while (<FILE>) {
> >+        # If there is a trailing '\' then kill the new line
> >+        if (/\\$/) {
> >+            chomp;
> 
> You could've removed newlines from all lines and rewrap everything so
> we're consistent.

NB, some files have multiple commands in them, so we can't blindly
remove all new lines. We have to preserve boundaries between
commands.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]