Re: Entering freeze for libvirt-1.2.21

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Daniel,
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 02:01:54PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>   Hi Guido,
> 
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:00:41PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 03:28:51PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > >   As pointed our on Tuesday it's time for a new release. I have tagged
> > > the release candidate 1 in git and pushed signed tarball and rpms to
> > > the usual place at:
> > > 
> > >    ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/
> > > 
> > >   Based on my limited testing this works just fine, but that's very limited
> > > and doesn't test portability at all, so please give it a try !
> > 
> > I'm having trouble verifying the signature:
> > 
> > $ gpg --verify libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz.pgp libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
> > gpg: Signature made Do 29 Okt 2015 07:41:52 CET
> > gpg:                using DSA key 0x4606B8A5DE95BC1F
> > gpg: please do a --check-trustdb
> > gpg: BAD signature from "Daniel Veillard (Red Hat work email) <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx>" [unknown]
> > 
> > while verifying e.g. 1.2.20 works as expected.
> 
>   Hum, where is libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz.pgp coming from ? I only uploaded
> libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz.asc !

It's the same file. Debian's uscan just renames it after download.

> 
>   that said indeed there is an issue with rc1 signing ...
> 
> [root@libvirt libvirt]# gpg2 --keyserver hkp://pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DE95BC1Fgpg: requesting key DE95BC1F from hkp server pgp.mit.edu
> gpg: /root/.gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
> gpg: key DE95BC1F: public key "Daniel Veillard (Red Hat work email) <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx>" imported
> gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
> gpg: Total number processed: 1
> gpg:               imported: 1
> [root@libvirt libvirt]# gpg --verify libvirt-1.2.20.tar.gz.asc libvirt-1.2.20.tar.gz
> gpg: Signature made Fri 02 Oct 2015 01:12:08 PM CEST using DSA key ID DE95BC1F
> gpg: Good signature from "Daniel Veillard (Red Hat work email) <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx>"
> gpg:                 aka "Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@xxxxxx>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: C744 15BA 7C9C 7F78 F02E  1DC3 4606 B8A5 DE95 BC1F
> [root@libvirt libvirt]# gpg --verify libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz.asc libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
> gpg: Signature made Thu 29 Oct 2015 07:41:52 AM CET using DSA key ID DE95BC1F
> gpg: BAD signature from "Daniel Veillard (Red Hat work email) <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx>"
> [root@libvirt libvirt]#
> 
>   I verified, the libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz.asc present on libvirt server is
> the same that I have left in my working dir of the machine where I assembled
> the release.
>   On the other hand libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz diverges
> 
> thinkpad2:~/libvirt -> sha256sum libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
> 3cc9f2882a145562ee41b8369a8c3d1cb0f383fe13c3e39ac923f712bf8614d0  libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
> thinkpad2:~/libvirt ->
> 
> and 
> 
> [root@libvirt libvirt]# sha256sum libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
> 00cce64d4eb906f294921effab7b0128dbded46da614f9d88681abdb80af0ae2  libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
> [root@libvirt libvirt]# 
> 
>   I remember that I interrupted the rsync when pushing the release and restarted
> it this may have introduced that divergence, I reuploaded the rc1:
> 
> [root@libvirt libvirt]# sha256sum libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
> 3cc9f2882a145562ee41b8369a8c3d1cb0f383fe13c3e39ac923f712bf8614d0  libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
> [root@libvirt libvirt]# sha256sum libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz.asc
> 9bfb1fe53c5d1457d5bc6a4f7ce4661ad925210f9ab2708bd0c523accf16f5e5  libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz.asc
> [root@libvirt libvirt]# gpg --verify libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz.asc libvirt-1.2.21-rc1.tar.gz
> gpg: Signature made Thu 29 Oct 2015 07:41:52 AM CET using DSA key ID DE95BC1F
> gpg: Good signature from "Daniel Veillard (Red Hat work email) <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx>"
> gpg:                 aka "Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@xxxxxx>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: C744 15BA 7C9C 7F78 F02E  1DC3 4606 B8A5 DE95 BC1F
> [root@libvirt libvirt]# 
> 
>   and that version is fine,

Indeed. With the new tarball it verifies correctly. Thanks!

Cheers,
 -- Guido

> 
>    thanks for the heads-up !
> 
> Daniel
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Veillard      | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat
> veillard@xxxxxxxxxx  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
> http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
> 

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]