Re: [PATCH] locking: Add io_timeout to sanlock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 01:37:54PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251190

So, if domain loses access to storage, sanlock tries to kill it
after some timeout. So far, the default is 80 seconds. But for
some scenarios this might not be enough. We should allow users to
adjust the timeout according to their needs.


Shouldn't we check for whether the current sanlock version supports
that?  Or require new enough version in configure/libvirt.spec?  I
understand the _timeout option was added later then the previous one.

Otherwise looks good, if you convince me that there is no need for the
check then it can go in as it is.

Martin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]