On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:26:01 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> src/libvirt_private.syms | 2 ++
> src/locking/lock_manager.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> src/locking/lock_manager.h | 9 +++++++++
> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
>
[...]
> diff --git a/src/locking/lock_manager.c b/src/locking/lock_manager.c
> index a002ea8..8fc82c8 100644
> --- a/src/locking/lock_manager.c
> +++ b/src/locking/lock_manager.c
> @@ -397,3 +397,35 @@ int virLockManagerFree(virLockManagerPtr lock)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +int virLockManagerRememberSeclabel(virLockManagerPtr lock,
> + const char *path,
> + const char *model,
> + const char *label)
> +{
> + VIR_DEBUG("lock=%p path=%s model=%s label=%s",
> + lock, path, model, label);
> +
> + if (!lock)
> + return 0;
> +
> + CHECK_MANAGER(drvRemember, 0);
Reporting an error but then returning success doesn't seem to be the
right thing to do.
> +
> + return lock->driver->drvRemember(lock, path, model, label);
> +}
> +
> +int virLockManagerRecallSeclabel(virLockManagerPtr lock,
> + const char *path,
> + const char *model,
> + char **label)
> +{
> + VIR_DEBUG("lock=%p path=%s model=%s label=%p",
> + lock, path, model, label);
> +
> + if (!lock)
> + return 0;
> +
> + CHECK_MANAGER(drvRecall, 0);
Same here.
> +
> + return lock->driver->drvRecall(lock, path, model, label);
> +}
Peter
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list