On 10/08/2015 02:52 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 10/07/2015 12:50 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:else fprintf(stdout, "%s (%s)\n", - _(failMessages[level]), hint); + _(failMessages[level]), msg); + free(msg);make syntax-check doesn't complain, but should we be consistently using VIR_FREE()? (actually it looks like there are a lot of these already existing, although VIR_FREE() has at least one use in virt-host-validate-common.c dating all the way back to the original commit)
I spoke too soon - when I fixed the fclose() occurences, *then* syntax-check complaining about free() (and I also saw that all of the "already existing" occurrences were actually newly added in this same patch.
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list