On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 18:38:05 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > Rename the function to virDomainDefCheckDuplicateDiskInfo and make it > check disk serials too. > > Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245013 > --- > src/conf/domain_conf.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- > src/conf/domain_conf.h | 2 +- > src/libvirt_private.syms | 2 +- > src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c > index 393ece7..e9d61db 100644 > --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c > +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c > @@ -24451,7 +24451,7 @@ virDomainDefNeedsPlacementAdvice(virDomainDefPtr def) > > > int > -virDomainDefCheckDuplicateDiskWWN(virDomainDefPtr def) > +virDomainDefCheckDuplicateDiskInfo(virDomainDefPtr def) > { > size_t i; > size_t j; > @@ -24469,6 +24469,19 @@ virDomainDefCheckDuplicateDiskWWN(virDomainDefPtr def) > } > } > } > + > + if (def->disks[i]->serial) { > + for (j = i + 1; j < def->ndisks; j++) { > + if (STREQ_NULLABLE(def->disks[i]->serial, > + def->disks[j]->serial)) { > + virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, > + _("Disks '%s' and '%s' have identical serial"), > + def->disks[i]->dst, > + def->disks[j]->dst); > + return -1; > + } > + } > + } Any reason for going through all disks twice? Wouldn't it be better to go through them once and check for both serial and wwn within a single loop? :-) Jirka -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list