On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:25:23PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > I'm not sure about the patch to libvirt.init.in, but rpmlint is quite > > insistent that we need this, or else we shouldn't start libvirtd by > > default. > > rpmlint is dumb. If we turn it off by default, then we'll just get a > steady stream of bugs / confused users, who install libvirt RPM (or > the "Virtualization Group" in installer), reboot and find it is not > working because the daemon wasn't started. This would be a disservice > to our users, which I don't think we should do Maybe you (or I) misunderstand the change to libvirtd.init.in. Supposedly this change should keep it on by default, AND silence rpmlint as well. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list