On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 12:15:02PM +0100, Stefan de Konink wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 09:53:04AM +0000, Gihan Munasinghe wrote: > >>Is there a specific reason for not having a "free_memory" with in the > >>"virNodeInfo" structure. > > > >All public structures are part of the public ABI and channot > >be changed once added. > > In that case, when do you consider a .so bump an option? Never. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list