Hi, On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 02:31:41PM -0400, Jonathan Toppins wrote: > I am willing to work with Guido if you have some time to put into it. > Otherwise the current implementation <interface type="foo"> models are > pretty much 1:1 representations of what is in the C code and this looks > pretty extensible to me. Have not seen any (or very few) copy-and-paste > sections of code so it seems to be holding up currently. I will not try and > speak for supporting the xml configuration long term, would appreciate some > other perspectives. Lacking this I leave it up to the maintainer(s) to > determine if this is worthy to go in. I see v1.2.19-rc2 has been put out > there so a possible compromise (policy even?) is for this to go into > v1.2.20-devel so people can play around with it. I assume implementations > can be changed/reverted between releases v1.2.19 to v1.2.20. Completely > understand the concern about supporting an interface for ever :) >From what I read in the thread going with "udp" is fine so let's stick to that if nobody has concerns. Cheers, -- Guido -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list