Hi,
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 04:06:18PM -0400, Jonathan Toppins wrote:
> On 08/31/2015 03:25 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
> >Hi,
> >On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 04:19:10PM -0400, Jonathan Toppins wrote:
> >>Adds a new interface type using UDP sockets, this seems only applicable
> >>to QEMU but have edited tree-wide to support the new interface type.
> >>
> >>The interface type required the addition of a "localaddr" (local
> >>address), this then maps into the following xml and qemu call.
> >>
> >><interface type='udp'>
> >
> >
> >Sine we do have
> >
> > <interface type='mcast'>
> >
> >already wouldn't it be better to have something like
> >
> > <interface type='ucast' protocol='udp'>
> >
>
> This possibly could be better, my concern would be now tcp is configured
> differently than udp, no? Or are you saying something like:
tcp client/server is configured with
<interface type='server'>
atm which fits as well. That said I don't have a strong opinion on that
one.
> <interface type='ucast' protocol='udp|tcp'>
>
> My concern here is this would be a bigger change and does libvirt have a
> stable xml configuration guarantee?
XML of older lbvirt must be parseable by newer ones, yes.
Cheers,
-- Guido
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list