On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 02:49:50PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 02:30:02PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > >> "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 01:07:49PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > >> ... > >> >> Here's an incremental diff that also includes additional changes, e.g., > >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > >> > [snip more of the same] > >> > > >> > Have you got the actual patch against current CVS, since this doesn't > >> > appear to be it ? > >> > >> Yep. It was attached at the end, after this: > >> > >> >> Here's the 10-change-set sequence: > > > > This is the section I was quoting - it a seems to be identical to the > > incremental diff. ACK, this makes more sense now Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list