Re: Bump tar format?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 04:59:35PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:49:20PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 15:58 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Any suggestions on how to proceed?
> > > 
> > > We've hit this many times before and always just shorten the file
> > > names in GIT to avoid it.
> > > 
> > > Really we could do with adding a check for filename length to
> > > make check to avoid this again.
> > 
> > Might not be trivial, as limits are apparently different for symbolic
> > links and regular files, nevermind the fact that very similar versions
> > of tar (eg. Fedora 22 and Fedora rawhide) don't behave the same.
> 
> It isn't that hard. The max symlink length is 100.

Sorry, replied too soon. See next mail.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]