Re: [PATCH 2/2] cmdVcpuPin: Remove dead code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 16:37:01 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> There's this condition:
> 
> flags & VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CURRENT && virDomainIsActive(dom)
> 
> which can never be true since VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CURRENT has hardcoded
> value of zero. Therefore virDomainIsActive() is a dead code. However,
> the condition could make sense if it is rewritten as the following:
> 
> !(flags & VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG) && virDomainIsActive(dom)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/virsh-domain.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/virsh-domain.c b/tools/virsh-domain.c
> index ac04ded..f7edeeb 100644
> --- a/tools/virsh-domain.c
> +++ b/tools/virsh-domain.c
> @@ -6499,7 +6499,7 @@ cmdVcpuPin(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd)
>  
>          if (got_vcpu && vcpu >= ncpus) {
>              if (flags & VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE ||
> -                (flags & VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CURRENT &&
> +                (!(flags & VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG) &&

This still is dead code since VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG is 0. If you mask
it with any flags you'll get 0, then invert it, it's always true.

Peter

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]