On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 04:43:15PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> >> I really don't see the point of evaluating possible but unlinkely[1] >> impact on any distro. As I said, we give distros enough time and that >> should be more than enough upstream could do. i-e these exact details >> are irrelevant to me. Since they are very relevant to you, I'd suggest >> you do the research and then let me know which solution you want and I >> will implement that. > > Patches of yours broke the build, you have a strong opinion on the right way > to fix it, in such situations I usually go the extra mile to > convince others that it's the best way :) That's why I'm a bit surprised > this drags for so long with no real attempt at finding some common > ground. I gave you an easy way out of this dragging discussion and even promised to implement either of the solutions you want me to. You're still not happy so I'll just bump the dependencies now. Feel free to implement ugly hack solution. I'm out here.. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list