Hi Marc-André:
On 07/13/2015 05:49 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As said in previous attempt by Luyao to do this, the auditing should
be handled differently, there's also lot more info to audit. Thanks
for the patch, but this must be done in another way.
Could you please give me a pointer?
Here : http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-July/msg00316.html
As Martin's reply in this mail, the memory size is not enought, we need
audit more information (just like shmobj name, the server socket path).
Thanks a lot for your patch.
thanks
Luyao
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list