On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:00:25PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote: > Alan Pevec wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Daniel P. Berrange > > <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> NB, if you're re-packaging libvirt for EPEL-5, be warned that none of > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Does_EPEL_replace_packages_provided_within_Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_or_layered_products.3F > > > > libvirt cannot be in EPEL-5 since it's in baseOS > > no, i'd like to add to my onw repo and may be later to centos's extras repo. > the current rhel-5 kvm support is simple unusable:-( you can only use > xen in that case. and unfortunately as rhel don't want updat their > kernel in rhel-5 kvm support never will really good. To clarify there is *NO* RHEL-5 KVM support at all. It is not part of RHEL-5. So it say it is unusable is to criticise something which does not exist. Any KVM support found in RHEL-5 is something added by a 3rd party. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list