On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09:40:50PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> diff --git a/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject.sym b/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject.sym
> index 88ca271..d345813 100644
> --- a/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject.sym
> +++ b/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject.sym
> @@ -287,6 +287,19 @@ LIBVIRT_GOBJECT_0.2.2 {
> gvir_connection_get_networks;
>
> gvir_interface_get_mac;
> +
> + gvir_ip_addr_type_get_type;
> +
> + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_clientid;
> + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_expirytime;
> + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_hostname;
> + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_iaid;
> + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_iface;
> + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_ip;
> + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_ip_type;
> + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_mac;
> + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_prefix;
> + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_type;
What about the second paragraph from
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-June/msg01649.html:
« [snip]
Just realized now, but wouldn't we be better off with
gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_client_id;
gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_expiry_time;
instead of
gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_clientid;
gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_expirytime; »
Christophe
Attachment:
pgpJcp0XuOmss.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list