Re: [PATCH 0/3] Address a couple of mpath/Multipath storage pool issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24.06.2015 15:06, John Ferlan wrote:
> My thought was to combine patch 2 and 3 unless it was felt that disallowing
> more than one Multipath pool to defined at one time (patch 3) was unnecessary
> 
> For patch 1, I did some searching and came across the following to describe
> why /dev/mpath is no longer valid:
> 
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.device-mapper.devel/13864
> 
> I kept /dev/mpath as a valid option only just in case there's some strange
> back-compat issue or some platform where /dev/mpath is preferred/used
> instead of /dev/mapper.
> 
> 
> John Ferlan (3):
>   mpath: Update path in CheckPool function
>   docs: Clarify the Multipath target path value usage
>   mpath: Don't allow more than one mpath pool at a time
> 
>  docs/formatstorage.html.in          | 2 ++
>  docs/storage.html.in                | 3 ++-
>  src/conf/storage_conf.c             | 3 +++
>  src/storage/storage_backend_mpath.c | 3 ++-
>  4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

ACK and safe for the freeze.

Michal

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]