Re: [PATCH] Revert "Introduce QEMU_CAPS_ARM_VIRT_PCI"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 14:06:27 +0300, Pavel Fedin wrote:
>  Hello!
> 
> > I'm inclined to ACK this, but I'd love to hear committer or original
> > author's opinions.
> 
>  1. Does it really harm? We are going to use it soon. Unfortunately looks like we have opinion
> collision with Cole who says that virtio-pci support is bad only because current distros don't
> support it. Because for some weird reason, i guess, PCI support is disabled in the kernel.

In case we would never add this feature in the next releases or decide
for a different capability then we'd need to carry this stuff forever.

I'm not opposed to the capability. I'm opposed to the fact that we would
ship it without knowing whether it will be used ever. That's why such
stuff should be pushed along with the patch that is actually using it.

Peter

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]