The pool name has to be the same too to warrant rejecting a pool definition as duplicate. This regression was introduced in commit 2184ade3a0546b915252cb3b6a5dc88e9a8d2ccf. Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236438 --- src/conf/storage_conf.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/conf/storage_conf.c b/src/conf/storage_conf.c index 4bbed4f..4fa065d 100644 --- a/src/conf/storage_conf.c +++ b/src/conf/storage_conf.c @@ -2471,13 +2471,22 @@ virStoragePoolSourceFindDuplicate(virConnectPtr conn, if (STREQ(pool->def->target.path, def->target.path)) matchpool = pool; break; - case VIR_STORAGE_POOL_NETFS: + case VIR_STORAGE_POOL_GLUSTER: + if (STREQ(pool->def->source.name, def->source.name) && + STREQ(pool->def->source.dir, def->source.dir) && + virStoragePoolSourceMatchSingleHost(&pool->def->source, + &def->source)) + matchpool = pool; + break; + + case VIR_STORAGE_POOL_NETFS: if (STREQ(pool->def->source.dir, def->source.dir) && virStoragePoolSourceMatchSingleHost(&pool->def->source, &def->source)) matchpool = pool; break; + case VIR_STORAGE_POOL_SCSI: if (pool->def->source.adapter.type == VIR_STORAGE_POOL_SOURCE_ADAPTER_TYPE_FC_HOST && -- 2.4.1 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list