On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 15:17:50 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 13:47:50 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 02:42:50PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > qemu's event has following format:
> > >
> > > {
> > > "timestamp": {
> > > "seconds": 1435580974,
> > > "microseconds": 82226
> > > },
> > > "event": "SPICE_INITIALIZED",
> > > "data": {
> > > "server": {
> > > "auth": "none",
> > > "port": "5900",
> > > "family": "ipv4",
> > > "host": "127.0.0.1"
> > > },
> > > "client": {
> > > "port": "53224",
> > > "family": "ipv4",
> > > "channel-type": 3,
> > > "connection-id": 1113096064,
> > > "host": "127.0.0.1",
> > > "channel-id": 0,
> > > "tls": false
> > > }
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > Our code tried to extract the "service" field but qemu reports it as
> > > "port".
> >
> > Hmm, that's somewhat odd - did you check back historical versions of
> > QEMU where this event was first introduced to see if it has always
> > had this name ? It smells like the kind of thing that could have been
> > a regression at some point
>
> Actually the regression would be on the VNC side, since VNC uses
> "service" and the function that I've modified handles both. I failed to
> notice that fact at first.
Heh, I was thinking "service" was an old downstream-only spelling of
"port" and checked it wasn't the case. But I failed to notice the same
handler is used for VNC too...
Jirka
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list