Re: [PATCH 00/20] cpu_map.xml: Make CPU definitions easier to review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 03:16:59PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
> definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
> unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch with a sorted list
> of features.

Just to be clear, you are not making any functional changes in any
of the patches here, are you ? This is just re-arranging code lines
not adding any (previously missing) features.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]