Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- src/cpu/cpu_map.xml | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml b/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml index 73b0d8d..66cf2ee 100644 --- a/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml +++ b/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml @@ -742,9 +742,38 @@ </model> <model name='Nehalem'> - <model name='Penryn'/> + <vendor name='Intel'/> + <feature name='apic'/> + <feature name='clflush'/> + <feature name='cmov'/> + <feature name='cx16'/> + <feature name='cx8'/> + <feature name='de'/> + <feature name='fpu'/> + <feature name='fxsr'/> + <feature name='lahf_lm'/> + <feature name='lm'/> + <feature name='mca'/> + <feature name='mce'/> + <feature name='mmx'/> + <feature name='msr'/> + <feature name='mtrr'/> + <feature name='nx'/> + <feature name='pae'/> + <feature name='pat'/> + <feature name='pge'/> + <feature name='pni'/> <feature name='popcnt'/> + <feature name='pse'/> + <feature name='pse36'/> + <feature name='sep'/> + <feature name='sse'/> + <feature name='sse2'/> + <feature name='sse4.1'/> <feature name='sse4.2'/> + <feature name='ssse3'/> + <feature name='syscall'/> + <feature name='tsc'/> </model> <model name='Westmere'> -- 2.4.4 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list