On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 05:12:16PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > You can ignore the patch numbering. > There was yet another one adjusting po/POTFILES.in > that I'm not bothering to post. > > Probably not worth reviewing. > Some of it is just factorization. > Other bits reflect removal of coreutils-specific things (they're > migrating into coreutils' cfg.mk (was called Makefile.cfg). > On the other hand, a few are introduction of cu-specific bits, > but that are enabled only if certain coreutils-specific files > are present. This is to make later merges easier. > > I've made sure that "make syntax-check" still works. ACK If you're taking feature requests, one thing I'd like for the syntax-check target is for it to print out the name of each check it is running. We've got quite alot of checks and so it just sits there for a long time using 100% cpu and with no feedback as to what its doing. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list