On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 07:43:18PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > Since VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CURRENT is 0 the flag check does not make sense > as masking @flags with 0 will always equal to false. > --- > src/libvirt-domain.c | 6 ------ > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/libvirt-domain.c b/src/libvirt-domain.c > index 7e6d749..4d7b88a 100644 > --- a/src/libvirt-domain.c > +++ b/src/libvirt-domain.c > @@ -7267,12 +7267,6 @@ virDomainSetVcpusFlags(virDomainPtr domain, unsigned int nvcpus, > VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG, > error); > > - VIR_EXCLUSIVE_FLAGS_GOTO(VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CURRENT, > - VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE, > - error); > - VIR_EXCLUSIVE_FLAGS_GOTO(VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CURRENT, > - VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG, > - error); > VIR_EXCLUSIVE_FLAGS_GOTO(VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_GUEST, > VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG, > error); > -- > 2.4.1 > > -- > libvir-list mailing list > libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list ACK Pavel -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list