On 2015/6/15 20:33, Luyao Huang wrote: > When hot-plug a memory device, we don't check if there > is a memory device have the same address with the memory device > we want hot-pluged. Qemu forbid use/hot-plug 2 memory device > with same slot or the same base(qemu side this elemnt named addr). > > + for (i = 0; i < def->nmems; i++) { > + virDomainMemoryDefPtr tmp = def->mems[i]; > + > + if (tmp == mem || > + tmp->info.type != VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_DIMM) > + continue; > + > + if (mem->info.addr.dimm.slot == tmp->info.addr.dimm.slot) { > + virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, > + _("memory device slot '%u' is already being" > + " used by another memory device"), > + mem->info.addr.dimm.slot); > + return true; > + } > + > + if (mem->info.addr.dimm.base != 0 && tmp->info.addr.dimm.base != 0 && > + mem->info.addr.dimm.base == tmp->info.addr.dimm.base) { The logic here equals: if (mem->info.addr.dimm.base != 0 && mem->info.addr.dimm.base == tmp->info.addr.dimm.base) { will it be better like this? > + virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, > + _("memory device base '0x%llx' is already being" > + " used by another memory device"), > + mem->info.addr.dimm.base); > + return true; > + } > + } > + > + return false; > +} > + > char * > qemuBuildMemoryDeviceStr(virDomainMemoryDefPtr mem, > virDomainDefPtr def, > @@ -4993,6 +5027,9 @@ qemuBuildMemoryDeviceStr(virDomainMemoryDefPtr mem, > mem->targetNode, mem->info.alias, mem->info.alias); > > if (mem->info.type == VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_DIMM) { > + if (qemuCheckMemoryDimmConflict(def, mem)) > + return NULL; > + > virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",slot=%d", mem->info.addr.dimm.slot); > virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",addr=%llu", mem->info.addr.dimm.base); > } -- Oscar oscar.zhangbo@xxxxxxxxxx -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list