Re: [PATCH] util: Fix coverity warings in virProcessGetAffinity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 15:18:15 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 06/10/2015 09:27 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
> 
> >> So there are basically three options:
> >> 1) Silence the coverity warning
> > 
> > So on line just prior to CPU_ISSET_S either:
> > 
> > sa_assert(sizeof(unsigned long int) == sizeof(cpu_set_t));
> 
> Is that true even on 32-bit platforms?

This is never true. cpu_set_t is a structure that contains array of
unsigned longs that is 1024bits wide.

> 
> > 
> > or
> > 
> > /* coverity[overrun-local] */
> 
> Might be safer, even though I generally prefer sa_assert() over /* magic
> comment */

I'd go with this one in this case since the sa_assert one above probably
silences the warning in a bogous way.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]