On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:29:16AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224018 > > v1 here: > http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-May/msg00865.html > > This series adjusts the patches in order to first revert patches for > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206521 > > and rework the patch to be specific to/for the disk backend to not update > the allocation and available pool values. > > That removes the need to add 1 for the extended partition leaving only > the need to check for whether it's a refresh or create when zeroing out > the allocation value while processing the partition data. > > If this is accepted, bz 1206521 will be moved back to a state to allow > qe to recheck the change. > > John Ferlan (3): > Revert "storage: Don't duplicate efforts of backend driver" > storage: Don't adjust pool alloc/avail values for disk backend > storage: Fix problem with disk backend pool allocation calculation > ACK series Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list