On 05/28/2015 12:01 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:12:38AM +0300, Dmitry Guryanov wrote:
On 05/26/2015 08:05 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 08:04:25PM +0300, Maxim Nestratov wrote:
26.05.2015 18:01, Daniel P. Berrange пишет:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 05:57:41PM +0300, Maxim Nestratov wrote:
It is necessary to have unpolluted screen when connecting to
parallels driver via virsh.
Otherwise a lot of unexpected output one will get on the console.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Nestratov <mnestratov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
src/parallels/parallels_sdk.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/parallels/parallels_sdk.c b/src/parallels/parallels_sdk.c
index 542e09e..b717ccf 100644
--- a/src/parallels/parallels_sdk.c
+++ b/src/parallels/parallels_sdk.c
@@ -205,6 +205,9 @@ prlsdkInit(void)
{
PRL_RESULT ret;
+ /* Disable console output */
+ PrlApi_SwitchConsoleLogging(0);
Does the SDK logging ever produce anything that would be useful when
troubleshooting libvirt ?
If so, you might be better to protect this with
if (virGetEnvBlockSUID("LIBVIRT_PARALLELS_DEBUG") == NULL)
PrlApi_SwitchConsoleLogging(0);
IOW, so people can do
LIBVIR_PARALLELS_DEBUG=1 virsh ....
if they need to see debugging info
Regards,
Daniel
Actually these debug output can be helpful but as soon as they are written
to /var/log/parallels.log by default and duplicated to the console, I think
it is not necessary to keep them in two places.
Maybe it's worth mentioning this in commit message.
Ok, ack to your original patch then
I also agree with this patch, but I'll push it later because of code freeze.
This patch is trivial enough and really a bug fix, so I think you're
justified in pushing it during freeze.
Thanks! Pushed.
Regards,
Daniel
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list