On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:07:31PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 05/22/2015 08:01 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > > Some virsh commands have a size parameter, which is handled as scaled > > integer. We don't have any *feature* that would allow to use '-1' as > > maximum size, so it's safe to reject any negative values for those > > commands. > > > > Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159171 > > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > tools/virsh.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > ACK, particularly since it gets hard to justify whether -1M and -1G > would mean the same "maximum size". Thanks, pushed now. Pavel -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list