On 05/21/2015 06:14 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 05:52:01PM +0800, lhuang wrote:
On 05/21/2015 03:46 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 13:08:12 +0800, Luyao Huang wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223631
When set a memory device in the xml, <sysinfo> in xml will be lost.
Because we forgot restore ctxt->node to the oldnode after parse memory
device, this will make the parse function after virDomainMemoryDefParseXML
cannot find a node they need when parse a full xml(virDomainDefParseXML).
The commit message is really hard to read.
Okay, I will pay more attention about this. Maybe use the exist similar
commit message as an example will be a good choice.
Signed-off-by: Luyao Huang <lhuang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
src/conf/domain_conf.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
index bfdc94e..7ddc1ea 100644
--- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
+++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
@@ -11828,6 +11828,7 @@ virDomainMemoryDefParseXML(xmlNodePtr memdevNode,
if (virDomainDeviceInfoParseXML(memdevNode, NULL, &def->info, flags) < 0)
goto error;
+ ctxt->node = save;
return def;
A test case is missing. The bugzilla link contains one so I'll add it.
Oh, I see, I hesitated about if need introduce a unit test when i fix this
issue.
Seems this is a rule about which case need a new test, isn't it? :)
Our rule is that any addition to the XML parser needs to have a test case
added - especially true if the addition is fixing a parsing bug :-)
Oh, get it, i will record it to some place as i have a bad memory :) ,
thank you Daniel
Regards,
Daniel
Luyao
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list