On 05/06/2015 11:35 AM, Boris Fiuczynski wrote: > On 05/06/2015 05:32 PM, Laine Stump wrote: >> On 05/06/2015 11:20 AM, Boris Fiuczynski wrote: >>> On 05/06/2015 05:02 PM, Laine Stump wrote: >>>> On 05/06/2015 10:07 AM, Boris Fiuczynski wrote: >>>>>> Allow ccw devices to be used with multiqueues. >>>> Can you provide a bit more information in the commit log on the reason >>>> for this difference? Is the vectors= option not supported when >>>> using the >>>> ccw bus? Or is is simply not needed because it's determined >>>> automatically based on the number of fd's that are passed in? >>>> >>>> >>> Sure and sorry about the short commit log. >>> ccw provides a one to one relation of fds to queues and does not >>> support the vectors option. >>> >> >> Okay, ACK. >> >> I'll just add that sentence to the commit log message and push it. No >> need to respin. >> >> Thanks! >> > Laine, > please also cleanup the line > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxx.comCornelia Huck > <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>> > which I accidentally screwed up. > Sure. I also just noticed while running "make syntax-check" that you called virBufferAsprintf() on a string with no format characters; I'm replacing that with a call to virBufferAddLit(). -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list