https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176020 We had a check for the vcpu count total number in <numa> before, however this check is not good enough. There are some examples: 1. one of cpu id is out of maxvcpus, can set success(cpu count = 5 < 10): <vcpu placement='static'>10</vcpu> <cell id='0' cpus='0-3,100' memory='512000' unit='KiB'/> 2. use the same cpu in 2 cell, can set success(cpu count = 8 < 10): <vcpu placement='static'>10</vcpu> <cell id='0' cpus='0-3' memory='512000' unit='KiB'/> <cell id='1' cpus='0-3' memory='512000' unit='KiB'/> 3. use the same cpu in 2 cell, cannot set success(cpu count = 11 > 10): <vcpu placement='static'>10</vcpu> <cell id='0' cpus='0-6' memory='512000' unit='KiB'/> <cell id='1' cpus='0-3' memory='512000' unit='KiB'/> Add a check for numa cpus, check if duplicate use one cpu in more than one cell. Signed-off-by: Luyao Huang <lhuang@xxxxxxxxxx> --- v3: remove the max vcpu check, just add a check when parse the numa settings, and change the subject. src/conf/numa_conf.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/conf/numa_conf.c b/src/conf/numa_conf.c index 7ad3f66..e25d7a8 100644 --- a/src/conf/numa_conf.c +++ b/src/conf/numa_conf.c @@ -738,6 +738,15 @@ virDomainNumaDefCPUParseXML(virDomainNumaPtr def, } VIR_FREE(tmp); + for (j = 0; j < i; j++) { + if (virBitmapOverlaps(def->mem_nodes[j].cpumask, + def->mem_nodes[i].cpumask)) { + virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, + _("NUMA cells %zu and %zu have overlapping vCPU ids"), i, j); + goto cleanup; + } + } + ctxt->node = nodes[i]; if (virDomainParseMemory("./@memory", "./@unit", ctxt, &def->mem_nodes[cur_cell].mem, true, false) < 0) -- 1.8.3.1 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list