On 04/29/2015 03:42 PM, Guido Günther wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 07:51:11PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >> Many users, who admin their own machines, want to be able to access >> system libvirtd via tools like virt-manager without having to enter >> a root password. Just google 'virt-manager without password' and >> you'll find many hits. I've read at least 5 blog posts over the years >> describing slightly different ways of achieving this goal. >> >> Let's finally add official support for this. >> >> Install a polkit-1 rules file granting password-less auth for any user >> in the new 'libvirt' group. Create the group on RPM install >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957300 >> --- >> daemon/50-libvirt.rules | 9 +++++++++ >> daemon/Makefile.am | 13 +++++++++++++ >> libvirt.spec.in | 15 +++++++++++++-- >> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 daemon/50-libvirt.rules >> >> diff --git a/daemon/50-libvirt.rules b/daemon/50-libvirt.rules >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..01a15fa >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/daemon/50-libvirt.rules >> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ >> +// Allow any user in the 'libvirt' group to connect to system libvirtd >> +// without entering a password. >> + >> +polkit.addRule(function(action, subject) { >> + if (action.id == "org.libvirt.unix.manage" && >> + subject.isInGroup("libvirt")) { >> + return polkit.Result.YES; >> + } >> +}); > > That's what we're shipping in Debian since quiet some time: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-libvirt/libvirt.git/tree/debian/polkit/60-libvirt.rules > > even with the same group name (which came from the group that owns the > socket for socket based permissions). Would be great to be consistent > across distros. > Latest version of the patch uses libvirtadm at Dan's suggestion... but if there's already precedent with what debian is shipping we might want to stick with plain 'libvirt'. Dan, thoughts? - Cole -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list