Re: [PATCH] rng: fix port number range validation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:15:00 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote:
> The PortNumber data type is declared to derive from 'short'.
> Unfortunately this is an signed type, so validates the range
> [-32,768, 32,767] which excludes valid port numbers between
> 32767 and 65535.
> 
> We can't use 'unsignedShort', since we need -1 to be a valid
> port number too.
> 
> This change is to use 'int' and set an explicit max boundary
> instead of relying on the data types' built-in max.
> 
> One of the existing tests is changed to use a high port number
> to validate the schema.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214664
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  docs/schemas/basictypes.rng                                  | 3 ++-
>  tests/qemuxml2argvdata/qemuxml2argv-graphics-vnc-policy.args | 2 +-
>  tests/qemuxml2argvdata/qemuxml2argv-graphics-vnc-policy.xml  | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

ACK

Peter

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]