On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 01:24:53PM +0000, John Levon wrote: > We should be considering why libvirt is /well-placed/ to configure the > host. I think it should be pretty clear that it's actually not: the > problems around distro differences alone is a good indication. The > proposed API is anaemic enough to not be of much use. This is precisely why it is merely a proposal - if you can elaborate on why is insufficiently useful we can discuss how to address the shortcomings or whether the extra needs should be declared out of scope. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list