Re: [PATCH 0/6] Few NUMA fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 03:26:48PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> The heart of the patchset are the last two patches. Long story
> short, if a domain is configured to be pinned onto a set of NUMA
> nodes stricly, we use both CGroups and numa_set_membind(). While
> we can change the former later on a user's wish, we can't change
> the latter. Therefore, any subsequent memory enlargement (e.g.
> via virsh setmem $dom) will result in memory still being
> allocated from old NUMA nodes and OOM killer interference is
> likely to occur.
> 
> Michal Privoznik (6):
>   virCgroupNewPartition: Fix comment
>   virCgroupNew: Enhance debug message
>   virCgroupController: Check the enum fits into 'int'
>   qemuDomainGetNumaParameters: Check for the correct CGroup controller
>   qemuProcessHook: Call virNuma*() iff needed
>   virLXCControllerSetupResourceLimits: Call virNuma*() iff needed
> 

ACK to patches 1-4, safe during the freeze.

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]