>>> I have tested your series with our qemu memory hot remove patch series, >>> here would be a possible error. >>> >>> When hotplug a memory device, its size has been aligned. So the >>> compare for >>> size here would fail possiblely. >>> >> hmm.. Not sure that's necessary - although Peter can make the final >> determination... Commit id '57b215a' doesn't modify each def->mems[i] >> entry in qemuDomainAlignMemorySizes, rather it gets a value from >> virDomainDefSetMemoryInitial and then does the rounding. >> >> If the stored def->mems[i]->size value is/was modified, then I'd agree, >> but it doesn't appear to be that way. >> >> If there is a rounding of the value - then please just point it out > > Yes, the stored def->mems[i]->size value was modified. > If you assign the size 524287 KiB, the stored value will be 524288. > > Thanks, > Zhu > Ah - found it - patch 9 has: + /* Align memory module sizes */ + for (i = 0; i < def->nmems; i++) + qemuDomainMemoryDeviceAlignSize(def->mems[i]); + Which I missed on my first foray through this. Once I cscope'd on VIR_ROUND_UP() instead of ->size, it became apparent So yes, it seems the to be compared size needs a likewise adjustment. John -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list