On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:45:57PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
Our documentation isn't 100% clear about hostdev 'managed' attribute usage, because it only makes sense to use it with PCI devices, yet we format this attribute to all hostdev devices. By adding a note into the docs, we can possibly avoid confusion from customer's side and also avoid a solution using ternary logic. Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155887 --- docs/formatdomain.html.in | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
ACK and pushed.
diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
index fb0a0d1..6276a61 100644
--- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
+++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
@@ -3110,6 +3110,12 @@
then this setting not required.
</dd>
</dl>
+ <p>
+ Note: The <code>managed</code> attribute is only used with PCI devices
+ and is ignored by all the other device types, thus setting
+ <code>managed</code> explicitly with other than PCI device has the same
+ effect as omitting it.
+ </p>
</dd>
<dt><code>source</code></dt>
<dd>The source element describes the device as seen from the host using
--
1.9.3
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Attachment:
pgpH3sOFtXCL3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list