On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:54:58AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > With current libvirt, it's not possible to specify a script for > > VIR_DOMAIN_NET_TYPE_BRIDGE. Is this just an oversight, or intentional? > > That's intentional - if you want to use a generic network script then > use the type=ethernet style of network config instead of type=bridge OK, why? Is there a reason for this restriction? > > Suggestions on how to fix this? Should I just add script handling to > > this net type? > > If the Solaris VIF setup script isn't called 'vif-bridge', then we can > just #ifdef the alternate name required for Solaris & everything else > should just work Nope, since we have at least two standard scripts that are usable. Also, this is a back-compat issue (presumably, even for Linux...) that I don't think we can avoid. regards john -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list