On 02/25/2015 04:50 AM, lhuang wrote: > > > And i also thought about another issue after your reminding: An > interface can have more than one IPv6 address. But i still couldn't > find a good way until now to chose which IPv6 address if we find more > than one IPv6 address in one interface (maybe users should use "listen > type=address" instead of "listen type=network" in this case ;)). > > There are some special addresses anddefault address selection for IPv6 > address, i don't know if it is a good idea to guess which address is > the caller really desired if we get some IPv6 address in one interface. If they are using listen type='network', then either they will have taken care to have the network only have a single IP, or they won't care. Otherwise, as you say, they should use listen type='address'. BTW, some history for listen type='network' - this feature was added to allow a way to remove the explicit listen address from the domain config, thus allowing the domain to be migrated from one host to another, as long as there is a network with the same name on both hosts. Often the network used for this is created only for this purpose. If the physical interface named in the network has multiple IP addresses, there really isn't a good way for libvirt to indicate preference for any one of the addresses over another (you can't specify it with an index, because the index of the desired IP address may be different between the hosts. Because it's impossible to do it right, I say we shouldn't even try; it would be worse for it to work halfway. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list