Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] Boot options cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 09:17:27 -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
> On 02/25/2015 07:52 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:

...

> > 
> 
> ACK both
> 
> If I understand the rules of the road correctly... Since the original
> series was reviewed prior to the freeze and this just adjust that, it
> seems reasonable to say it's OK for freeze...

Actually I'd rather not codify that as a rule. After the freeze
everythling should be re-evaluated if it makes sense actually to push.

Purpose of the freeze is not to limit new features appearing but have a
line where stuff that is likely to break the comming release in any way
to be limited.

If you get a review for a big feature prior to the freeze and then send
a few patches after the freeze it will not make them automagically
appear in the RC-package or any less likely to break the release.

I think only fixes that target code that was touched in the last devel
cycle or fix a obvious bug in a common path should be taken, otherwise 
we might as well as not have any freeze.

Peter

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]